Author.
2. What are the preconceptions, previously held opinions and/or potential areas for
personal bias that you should be aware of for Project 3? What about any of the
following?:
|
Audience.
young, college-aged, sexually-active, active party-ersWhat beliefs and assumptions might this audience already hold? What position are they likely to take on this issue? How will you respond to that position? Some of the audience may come from locations that actually have good sex ed (unlike AZ) and they might be shocked about the state of other's sex ed. Also, If one already has a good sex ed, they might not see the correlations in my argument. An older population that might react to my argument unfavorably by saying that young people shouldn't be sexually active until marriage. My response would be to include stats an research that abstinence only does harm and misinform.How might they react to your argument? As I am arguing that abstinence only programs are harmful and contribute to rape culture, dis-empowerment, and mis-information, I have a feeling many of my peers would agree with me. They all see the same daily shit that happen on campus as I do and most have personally dealt with situations themselves.How are you going to relate to or connect with your audience? Are there any specific words, ideas or ways of arguing that will help you relate to them in this way? pictures of campus- all the flyers(sex and consent) and blue lights. abstinence only is a wishful way of thinking for conservative adults who ignore what the young adults need to know. Sex ed should be as accurate and prevalent as bio or history classes.Think of one specific person or a set of people you know personally or professionally who fall within the definition of ‘target audience’ you’re using for Project 3. What could you tell them or say to them in order to convince them of your perspective? What would need to happen for them to agree with you? I would show them footage of people who have been harmed by the stigmas placed on sex in the abstinence only culture. There are lots of heartbreaking videos out there which are detailed in my sources. |
Purpose/Message.
2. Once you’ve done all your research and figured out what you think about the
controversy you’ve chosen, what still needs to be accomplished? For instance:
|
Context. What are the particular circumstances surrounding this assignment?
|
What genre?
What course genre will you be writing in for Project 3?
video essayWhat kinds of audience expectations come along with this genre, generally? video footage, editing skills, music transitions, a smooth viewing experience, a certain amount of entertainment valueWhat is your history working in the genre you have selected for Project 3? absolutely nothing- well, I've made animated videos but nothing where I talk about my own stance on somethingDescribe your comfort level and general feelings about the genre. How will they affect your work on Project 3? Learning how to use software to make a podcast was not to bad, so I'm hoping its the same for video editing. I also played around with the podcast stuff ahead of time so I should play around with the new software also.What are the two most effective conventions in this genre, in your opinion? Why? Be specific. One is the effectiveness of using graphics on an audience. It is a logos strategy and really helps cement an argument. Another is the ability to use other peoples personal accounts. Sad videos appeal to pathos feelings sometimes much more than mere writing does. |
When?
2. Who else is talking about this topic? Provide us with working hyperlinks to coverage of the controversy on FOUR different media outlets.
3. What are the three or four major counter-arguments you’ll have to respond to, based upon what people are saying in the press/media? Be specific and cite your sources using working hyperlinks.
|
Monday, April 4, 2016
Rhetorical Analysis of Project 3
Now that we're starting on project three, its time to define our rhetorical situations and start the preliminary research for the project. This blog post will focus giving broad summary for my project in particular.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Erica! I'm really excited to see what you have to say about this topic. I do have a few things to point out to you though:
ReplyDelete1. I'm not really sure what your argument is because you suggested two stances: Are you going to talk about the harms abstinence-only sex ed or are you talking about the lack of proper sex ed in middle and high school education? Making your stance much more specific will make this project go much smoother!
2. The first set of bullet points under your Message / Purpose left me really confused because it was incredibly vague. Who is 'them'? What are the actions that they're reflecting on?? What situation are they analyzing??? What part of their culture are they considering???? These questions will probably be answered once you have a more solid thesis or maybe being more precise in your purpose will help you develop a thesis.
3. I really like your counter-arguments because you have found solid claims that you can refute. Just make sure that you insert them in the appropriate places of your project instead of bunching them up so you don't overwhelm your audience!
4. Good luck with the video essay! I used Windows Movie Maker for my video essay for Project 1, which is really nice for a rough cut, but it proves to be a real pain in the ass when you're trying to edit, add, or change things. If you are able to use a different editing software, I would highly recommend it. In addition, make sure you have good audio-recording equipment for your voice overs. You will most likely be doing different takes at different times, so making your audio sound clear and consistent is key (I made the mistake of not doing this and it really killed the quality of my video).
Other than that, keep up the great work as always! :)